Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Connor McGwire's avatar

The original Mission Impossible was the first show I sae where I realized that the draw *was* watching extremely skilled people be extremely skilled. And the show knew it because the moment-to-moment drama came from near misses and unexpected complications and watching them deftly improvise.

I find this kind of extreme competence really satisfying if the art focuses on the details of how they accomplish the task. To the point if being one part training manual.

I tend to like to write these kinds of characters too, but I also like to make sure that the thing they're competent in is *not* the thing that will most directly lead them to their goal in the story. The main character of my novel is a very effective demon hunter and investigator, and only gets more so as he gains more training and experience. But that competence often backfires against his ultimate goals as he finds himself in the employ of people with questionable ambitions, in conflict with those he holds dear, and in constant danger of injury and death.

Put another way: he's really good at what he does, but sometimes he regrets doing it.

Expand full comment
Leanne Shawler's avatar

I actually replied to this in a note where someone shared your article and I wish I had copied the text now. It seems that where YA has gone wrong with their highly competent female character is that they come across as stupid? Having not read a whole lot of YA, I wonder if the authorial struggle is between wanting to create their fantasy character vs the way society wants them to be (pretty airheads that need to be coddled — basically have things handed to them as you described). If they are too competent, nobody (especially the reader) will like them. But there are examples of this highly competent female character done well, yes? It’s just everyone wants a piece of that pie and doesn’t quite have the chops to pull it off?

Expand full comment
32 more comments...

No posts