Oh boy, here I go again! More of my strange views of men and women, particularly as regards to fiction.
What set me off this time was a book blog I was reading. The book premise sounded interesting, so I clicked on to see if the author could sell me. I was almost ready to pick up the book when the author started virtual signaling. She talked about how she changed up the myth she was using because "she only writes female characters".
Nothing irritates me more than virtue signaling.
So I quit reading and tried to figure out why that had gotten under my skin the way it had. I'm writing multiple stories right now. The female characters in both of them are stronger than the men, mentally, sometimes physically, and as relates to their powers, definitely. I have nothing against strong women. As I mentioned in one of my other blogs, I don't actually know any weak women.
But it's writing them in a vacuum that bugs me. Guys are people, too. When I read, or write, or, heck, hang with friends, I want a mix. Men and women have different perspectives, and the interplay between them is so fascinating.
I looked at the books I like to read and write. And ... aha ... there's a pattern.
Howl's Moving Castle, by Diana Wynne Jones. Sophie is a Strong Woman helping a Weak Man who is under just as bad a curse as she is. Howl has more magic than she does, sure, but he can't save himself without help.
The Lake House, by Kate Morton. The main characters are all women--Alice the author, Sadie the cop, Eleanor the mother. All of them are mentored, helped, or in the case of Eleanor, desperately trying to help the men in their lives. The men are critically flawed in endearing and sometimes frightening ways, and these women shoulder impossible burdens to help them.
The Beaumont and Beasley series by Kyle Schultz. Although these books are told first person from the male perspective, Beasley is hampered by his sheer logic. Magic can't exist, therefore, it doesn't. Lady Cordelia comes along and wrecks that paradigm by accidentally turning him into a Beast. She's better educated than him, knows magic, and has all kinds of magical connections. But they need each other, because she's trying to break his curse, and he's the detective who still reasons out motives and puts together clues. (Great series, too.)
The more I thought about it, the more I realized the argument about Strong Women isn't stated very well. A Strong Woman is Strong, not when she can beat a man in a fistfight, but when she can reach out to a Weak Man and help him become strong.
Everybody needs help, men and women alike. In Proverbs, Solomon observes that an excellent wife will do her husband good, not evil, all the days of his life. He also points out that a wise woman builds her house, but a foolish woman tears it down with her hands.
In books, part of a character arc is that a character must start in a place that demands that they change in some way. Sophie acted like an old woman before she was cursed to become one. Alice believes she's responsible for the disappearance of her baby brother. Beasley thinks he has reality all figured out. They all start in a place of weakness. But that's part of the joy of fiction--that journey from weakness to strength, or acceptance, or whatever the goal of the story is.
When a male character is weak, often a Strong Woman can come along and help him out. This leads to the complex interplay between genders, that push and pull of attraction and affection. Conversely, a Weak Woman will need a Strong Man, but that's taboo in our culture, for some reason--admitting that a woman might ever be weak for some reason.
(This works in reverse, too--the strong one can tear down the weak one, and the weak one can undermine the strong one. These are toxic relationships, and aren't the point of this blog.)
As part of the ongoing cultural discussion about Strong Women, I thought this was an interesting new angle to explore. Strength is fine, but it means nothing unless it's used wisely, to build up others. That same strength can destroy and shatter. As writers (and readers!) it's something to be aware of.
Originally written in 2018 but still relevant.
Agreed, and also, very few interesting characters are all-strong or all-weak! In Disney's *Beauty and the Beast*, for example, the Beast is physically strong and saves Belle from wolves in one scene. And yet the overall plot is similar to *Howl's Moving Castle* and *Jane Eyre* where the psychologically strong woman helps the man with the curse or baggage he is dealing with. While also dealing with her own problems. And allowing herself to accept what he offers (the Beast's library for Belle's curiosity -- finding a kindred spirit). There's give and take.
"Interesting" is the key concept. If writers or marketers decide the most important thing about a character is to be a "good role model" or "good representation" then the character usually ceases to be interesting.
Excellent article. Our stories should encourage a world where women and men build each other up and not tear down; if it shifts in either other direction, it’s chaos.
“Conversely, a Weak Woman will need a Strong Man, but that's taboo in our culture, for some reason--admitting that a woman might ever be weak for some reason.”
I agree that it’s unfair to imply a woman cannot be weak “because it’s 2024 and progress” women are people and we are GOING to be weak sometimes for many different reasons. We aren’t robots. It’s sexist to imply that admitting a woman might sometimes be weak, is taboo.
Brilliant post! Thank you for sharing.